Paolo Lorenzi vs Frederik Nielsen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L W L W L
Form
L W W L L W L L W LHead To Head: Lorenzi 2 - 0 Nielsen
They have played 4 sets in total, with Lorenzi winning 4 and Nielsen winning 0. The last match between Lorenzi and Nielsen was at the Italy F2, 18-02-2008, Semifinals, I.hard with Paolo Lorenzi getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paolo Lorenzi | 2 |
| Frederik Nielsen | 0 |
Italy F2(18-02-2008)
7
6
6
3
| Lorenzi | Stats | Nielsen |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 33 | Highest Rank | 190 |
| 43 | Age | 41 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 25 | Titles | 13 |
| 54% (661-552) | Career Total W/L | 61% (560-365) |
| $2,093,629 | Career Prize Money | $69,005 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-3 | |||||
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 14 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Paolo Lorenzi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Maxime Janvier
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paolo Lorenzi
Player
Joao Sousa
48%
(
51 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
10
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
41%
(
23 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(5) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
13%
(
5 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paolo Lorenzi
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Frederik Nielsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Frederik Nielsen
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Frederik Nielsen
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Frederik Nielsen
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Fabrice Martin
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Frederik Nielsen
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kevin King
Player
Frederik Nielsen
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
57%
(
65 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
49 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (661/552) | Win/Loss | 61% (560/365) |
| 53% (1540/1367) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1249/943) |
| 51% (14117/13590) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10967/9885) |
| 51% (144/136) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (222/138) |
| 59% (467/329) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (61/47) |
| 43% (43/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (231/146) |
| 19% (7/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 58% (46/34) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2929 | Aces Total | 1554 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 2031 | Total Double Faults | 1200 |
| 1:4:45 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 579.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 568.4 |
| 59% (34631/58798) | 1st Serve % | 60% (17389/29128) |
| 69% (24058/34631) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (11956/17389) |
| 50% (12152/24170) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5931/11739) |
| 42% (2364/5672) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1227/2930) |
| 39% (23350/59570) | Return Points Win % | 40% (11924/29572) |
| 38% (40/65) | Slam W/L | 50% (9/9) |
| 40% (26/39) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (5/4) | Cups W/L | 52% (27/25) |
| 42% (103/141) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (37/39) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (453/288) | Challenger W/L | 57% (240/178) |
| 70% (33/14) | Futures W/L | 68% (247/114) |
| 55% (636/1146) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (522/866) |
| 36% (21/58) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (27/48) |
| 53% (232/434) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (159/299) |
| 53% (217/407) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (177/286) |
| 85% (634/539) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (506/451) |
| 15% (634/95) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (506/54) |
| 21% (579/123) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (419/107) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
